Risks and Rewards of Rising Rates

Should Investors Fear Higher Rates?

As every fixed income investor knows, bond prices fall as rates rise. Obviously, falling prices reduce returns. In today’s low yield environment, portfolio income offers little protection, meaning price changes dominate total return. However, fixed income investors with long time horizons should actually root for higher rates, despite the short term losses incurred.

Higher Rates Reduce Total Returns…

Risks and rewards of rising ratesWhile higher interest rates lead to lower total returns in any given period, the amount of loss depends on the interest rate risk present in the portfolio and the severity of the change in rates. Chart 1 depicts the expected twelve month total return of the Reinhart Partners Active Intermediate Composite given various instantaneous rate change. The chart shows that if nothing were to change, the expected total return of the portfolio is very close to its yield to maturity, in this case +1.5%. However, all else equal, the greater the increase in rates, the lower the expected total return. For example, if rates were to instantaneously rise 300 basis points, the portfolio’s expected 12 month total return is –7.4%. In a sector where positive returns have been the norm for the past 30+ years, a loss of 7.4% would likely qualify as a disastrous result

….But Not Forever!

risks and rewards of rising ratesIt is important to remember that the total return is a function of two forces, price changes and income. While higher rates negatively affect bond prices, they do come with a silver lining. Higher rates mean more income as bonds in a portfolio mature and are replaced with higher yielding securities. Chart 2 illustrates the growth of $100 in two distinct scenarios. In the first scenario (no change in rates), the portfolio’s value increases steadily, but slowly. The lack of price declines helps, but the portfolio is only growing by the amount of its small 1.5% yield to maturity. In the second scenario (instantaneous rate increase of 300 basis points), the 7.4% loss in year one is evident, but is offset in future years by a much higher portfolio yield. By the end of year 4, the two scenarios have returned roughly the same amount. By the end of year 10, the portfolio which experienced the negative price shock will have returned more than double the portfolio which did not. Over long time horizons, return from income dominates price changes caused by higher rates.